(Well, first of all say that hovering at such idea in his head should go buy an envelope and throwing pieces of paper to fill it once and for all and so on. This in order not to dilute the ideas and thoughts. )
According to a kilo of reflections, in short,
Now, say that:
These places, barren landscapes, which attempts to categorize (avoiding closed taxonomies) appear as anomalies in the city (according to their circumstances) and are timeless misplaced.
That the city reaches a very high level of complexity of its relentless product development and we somehow think, and deal with this rapidly changing reality.
That these landscapes, which arise from multiple processes (degeneration abandonment, exile in the process of reformulation, violent juxtaposition of large infrastructure, uncertainties and conurbations, etc.) are new opportunities for new perspectives.
That the incorporation of these opportunities to challenge new architectural language skills.
That face this scenario requires us to acquire a language not only technical but also economic and legal to responsibly incorporate us in the discussions that raise change.
That this participation is urgent as the city moves forward with little foresight by private and poor planning by the public (I mean the institutions, companies, etc).
That the city is moving forward in the process of an economic model that does not care for anyone but the thing is that with this we must assert our opinion on specific arguments by avoiding the theoretical arguments (they needed time to share views .)
That probably all happen at some point. I hope that soon, on my part.
According to a kilo of reflections, in short,
Now, say that:
These places, barren landscapes, which attempts to categorize (avoiding closed taxonomies) appear as anomalies in the city (according to their circumstances) and are timeless misplaced.
That the city reaches a very high level of complexity of its relentless product development and we somehow think, and deal with this rapidly changing reality.
That these landscapes, which arise from multiple processes (degeneration abandonment, exile in the process of reformulation, violent juxtaposition of large infrastructure, uncertainties and conurbations, etc.) are new opportunities for new perspectives.
That the incorporation of these opportunities to challenge new architectural language skills.
That face this scenario requires us to acquire a language not only technical but also economic and legal to responsibly incorporate us in the discussions that raise change.
That this participation is urgent as the city moves forward with little foresight by private and poor planning by the public (I mean the institutions, companies, etc).
That the city is moving forward in the process of an economic model that does not care for anyone but the thing is that with this we must assert our opinion on specific arguments by avoiding the theoretical arguments (they needed time to share views .)
That probably all happen at some point. I hope that soon, on my part.
